Jason’s Appellate Issues List

It must be a birth defect, or maybe they were malnourished as children, but the bull that FEW believe is just that…BULL.

 

1.  Non-Sequestered Jury

2.  The Mysterious 5 Days

3.  The 62 Second Theory

4.  Janeen DeMarte Said Her Laptop Was Stolen Before The Trial

5   The Blood in the Sink Mystery

6.  Ashley Reed Thompson

7.  No Blood Outside the Bedroom or in the Driveway, No Screwdriver

8.  The Kool-Aid Stains in the Rental Car

9.  The Crime Scene Clean-Up in 26 Minutes

10.  Travis and his Phone, Car Keys, Car, Wallet, Laptop, Dog, and CTR Ring

11.  The Odor of Decomposition

12.  Jodi’s Lies and Interviews 13. Pathology of the Courtroom

14.The Jury Never Asked any Questions or Asked to See Any Evidence

15. The Delay of the Trial

16. Who did the Laundry?

17.  The Belvin Perry Media Blitz

18.  The Gus Searcy Factor

 

Is it POSSIBLE – Why, yes, it is…

Auntie Sue, I truly feel for you, I do.  This is a horrible event in your life, in the lives of many people.  The problem is, your niece was Jilted, and from that came the HORRID death of a man that did not deserve it, by your own nieces words.

You posed questions.  I submit answers:

In her OWN words:

 

Is it POSSIBLE that acute stress caused Jodi to have no memory of the fight after Travis said “FKYB

No. Travis was shot first, in the shower. It is obvious that she remembers that:

“you can just see expressions on people`s faces and emotional moments. I love capturing that sort of thing”

He would never let me take pictures of him in the shower, you know, despite our intimacy he was very private about his showers.

to my knowledge there was no blood in that bathroom, before that gunshot went off.

It’s like everything just stops. When you — sitting there with a gun pointed to your head deciding your fate.
He’s like…if this is the shower and the sink is over here, I was like right here taking pictures, and I don’t really know what happened after that exactly, except I think he was shot.

When the gun went off I didn’t know, that I had shot him, I thought it hit a wall, so as far as calling 911, immediately after it wasn’t an option, he lunged at me and we fell, and wrestled there for a quick second before I broke away.

Travis was on all fours on the tile — and well, I say all fours, but one of his hands was actually holding his head.
He was, like, on his knees like this doing something like this or something like — I don’t know.

I remember putting my hand on his back, because he was on all four of his knees. He was like…on his knees like this doing something like this or something like, I don’t know…and

Travis was screaming the whole time. He wasn’t screaming like a girl. He was just like… like he was in pain… like he was like shocked, like “Ahhhh,” you know. He wasn’t really moving though, you know, he was just kind of staying still on the floor.

Yeah, I’m trying to think how he got over there. He was sort of using his legs, but he wasn’t standing up.

“He wasn`t really moving, though. He was just staying kind of still on the floor.”

 

Is it POSSIBLE the gun stolen in Yreka was simply a normal burglary?

No. Travis didn’t own a gun. She brought it with her.

The GUN:

Flores – Where was that gun from, then? Where did you get it? Everybody says he didn’t have one. Where did you get it if you didn’t take it? Did he have one in the house?
Arias – Not to my knowledge.

(Detective to Arias)
Was there, um, any kind of weapons, or was there a gun..

(Arias to Detective)
Um, his two fist really..

no he wasn’t one to keep any of that. No he was more into wrestling and UFC…

 

Is it POSSIBLE Jodi’s testimony is true?

Yes.

A sociopath can weave truth with lies. They are often intelligent and have lofty goals. They weave truth, fantasy and delusion flawlessly. They attack those who question them and their explanations can be fantastic and bizarre. Some see themselves as leaders and spin tales of roads to glory. Others literally see themselves as human deity, and have an incredible ability to persuade others.

“What would happen to me today, and from here on out, if I just told you every single detail right now and I gave you a confession?”

 

Is it POSSIBLE Jodi preferred a white car to a red car?

No.

The CAR:
“I just (unintelligible) it’s more noticeable (unintelligible).”

One of Travi’s roomies drove a white car.  She was attempting to go unnoticed.

 

Is it POSSIBLE Skater’s fooled about with her licence plates?

No. That was a lie.

 

Is it POSSIBLE Jodi felt guilty and ashamed after killing Travis, and so she lied?
Yes. She was facing the Death penalty.
“What would happen to me today, and from here on out, if I just told you every single detail right now and I gave you a confession?”

 

Is it POSSIBLE Jodi at one point planned to kill herself?

Yes.

 

is it POSSIBLE Jodi was abused but tried to hide that?

No.

Abuse:

“We’ve had our challenges. He’s said several choice words to me that weren’t nice. He’s not the only person that’s ever done that, my own father has done that, mother, and other women and men have done that to me, and other boyfriends but..”

He has done nothing but, I mean except for some mean words that he said, people have said worse to me…or just as bad. Except for that, he has never…he has helped me. He has given me money. He was selling me his car on the…easiest terms ever…
I’ve hurt him very much emotionally and I never meant to hurt him

It’s just a lot of things. Travis was always so selfless. He gave me everything that I needed. If I needed money and he had it, it was mine, if I needed food, if I needed to borrow his car, to use the internet because mine was down; I needed to…if I wanted to borrow his books. He had a cool library or audio books. One time he helped me with my prepaid legal business and he doesn’t benefit monetary in the least, and I would help him, too, with that because you have to qualify and for his position there’s a monthly qualification and I would just help him with computer stuff. I think I’m selfish.

And one time we just met in Ehrenberg when I went to southern California so we could just rent a hotel room and make out the whole weekend, and umm…whatever, but we drove to go see a movie and there was this lady (Jodi crying) standing on the side. He pulled over in his BMW and rolls down his window and says, “Are you hungry?” and she said, “Yeah,” so we turned around and went to the Wendy’s right next to the hotel and he got her this triple decker and the biggie fries or whatever it’s called and the biggest drink they had and gave it to her.

He always did stuff like that (Jodi takes some toilet paper and wipes her nose). We pulled into this gas station once in Chinle, Arizona and saw this Navajo Indian, and nothing against that tribe, they’ve got a very rich culture but most Navajos that you meet they are really overweight and…but their animals are starving with their ribs sticking out, and it just made us feel so bad. Travis bought, well, we ended up splitting it, but Travis bought 7 cheeseburgers for three hungry dogs and one was a mother with puppies and they just wolfed them down. We felt better, but we just felt like we couldn’t do enough.

Like he wrote that thing on his bog the Goal from Within, and I really did see like inside he was an amazing person. He was a good person. He was a generous person

They were far worse than Travis. (Other men)

Um, I wanted Travis to be viewed in a positive light, and I know that he wanted to be
viewed in a positive light, I didn’t want to DE-edify him especially not at the moment I made
those statements. Prior to June 4th that was a hope of mine, it wasn’t that I couldn’t wait, just
that sometimes PPL events would be family oriented and I would hope that our families would
be able to be cordial and kind. Not that we would ultimately be very close, but that was a hope
of mine, that someday we could be happy for each other in our respective marriages, and I
didn’t want to say anything bad about him.

In the words of her own PAID EXPERT:

Isn’t it true that Mr. Alexander was extremely afraid of the defendant, Jodi Arias, based on her stalking behavior?

He was afraid of her, yes.

Because of her stalking behavior, correct?

Correct.

Arias Anger/Behavior:
Were you mad at Travis while you were stabbing him?
A: I don’t remember fear being a prominent, oh, I’m sorry, I don’t recall anger being a prominent
Objection (prosecution) Previously she stated she didn’t remember, if she does remember
she should tell us.
A: Jodi – I remember emotions judge
Judge- The question is (repeats question)
A: I don’t remember being angry that day, I remember being terrified.

“Well I had a nervous breakdown when a boyfriend (DARYL) and I were arguing once and umm and he began to argue with me in a way that was totally different from how we had ever argued before, and he was just like, and every time I would say something he was like “Blah…Blah,” you know, it was kind of weird like, every time I tried to formulate a thought and I was just sad and I was crying, every time I tried to formulate a thought he would interject and then twist it and it was like the weirdest psychological thing that had ever happened, and the way I reacted was, I went into my room, this was the guy I bought a house with, I went into my room and shut the door. ”

 

~ ~ ~

 

snOZe – just SHUT UP.  Go worry about your own country.  

We certainly do NOT need your help.

 

 

On the other hand, is it POSSIBLE Jodi was planning to murder Travis when she called Ryan Burns and told him to expect her around 12am the next day?

“I’m just starting to remember. I’m just trying to remember that week, that whole week, and the week prior had a lot to do with it… the weekend or Friday night prior, I think. ” (May 30th)
Is it POSSIBLE Travis would stand at the sink doing nothing while Jodi stabbed him 9 times in the back?

Yes. He had been shot in the face. The wounds indicate she made five stabs, then Travis shifted to his left, causing a single cross cut. As he continued moving toward the window, she stabbed him three more times.
Is it POSSIBLE that the pool of blood near the entrance to the toilet got there by water washing it there?

No. Travis was stabbed in the head and neck as is indicated by blood splatter and his wounds.

Is it POSSIBLE a normal young woman with no history of violence or mental disturbance is a “Femme Fatale” cold blooded killer who would murder her ex-boyfriend out of the blue for no sensible reason?

YES.

“Well I had a nervous breakdown when a boyfriend (DARYL) and I were arguing once and umm and he began to argue with me in a way that was totally different from how we had ever argued before, and he was just like, and every time I would say something he was like “Blah…Blah,” you know, it was kind of weird like, every time I tried to formulate a thought and I was just sad and I was crying, every time I tried to formulate a thought he would interject and then twist it and it was like the weirdest psychological thing that had ever happened, and the way I reacted was, I went into my room, this was the guy I bought a house with, I went into my room and shut the door. “

Appellate Options – Debunked

1- The ultimate error: failure to sequester the jury in high profile international case
STANDARD 19: SEQUESTRATION OF JURORS

(a) A JURY SHOULD BE SEQUESTERED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSULATING ITS
MEMBERS FROM IMPROPER INFORMATION OR INFLUENCES.

(b) THE TRIAL JUDGE SHOULD HAVE THE DISCRETION TO SEQUESTER A JURY ON
THE MOTION OF COUNSEL OR ON THE JUDGE’S INITIATIVE, AND THE
RESPONSIBILITY TO OVERSEE THE CONDITIONS OF SEQUESTRATION.

(c) STANDARD PROCEDURES SHOULD BE PROMULGATED TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT:

(i) THE PURPOSE OF SEQUESTRATION IS ACHIEVED; AND

(ii) THE INCONVENIENCE AND DISCOMFORT OF THE SEQUESTERED JURORS IS
MINIMIZED.

(d) TRAINING SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO PERSONNEL WHO ESCORT AND ASSIST
JURORS DURING SEQUESTRATION. USE OF PERSONNEL ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN
LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR ESCORTING AND ASSISTING JURORS DURING
SEQUESTRATION IS DISCOURAGED.

41 days into the trial, Nurmi asked for sequester. Denied.
http://youtu.be/CbtpgT460mQ (http://youtu.be/CbtpgT460mQ?t=5m50s)

 

“The court asks the question of the jurors every morning, ‘Have you seen anything on the media?’

 

 

2- How can Juan Martinez charge Jodi Arias with felony murder?

“the offense involved the discharge, use or threatening exhibit of a .25 caliber hand gun and/or a knife or deadly weapon or dangerous instrument and/or the intentional or knowing infliction of serious physical injury”

 

 

3- During closing, Martinez told the jury to put themselves in Travis’ shoes — a blatant violation

did not violate mandatory statute or inject new facts into case.

“To preserve an allegedly improper prosecutorial comment for review, a defendant must object to the comment and move for a mistrial.”

 

 

4- Martinez also told the jury during his closing that if they don’t convict, they’re essentially filling the gas cans — another blatant violation

did not violate mandatory statute or inject new facts into case.

“To preserve an allegedly improper prosecutorial comment for review, a defendant must object to the comment and move for a mistrial.”

 

 

5- Martinez playing the part of a celebrity during a capital murder case

Irrelevant.

 

 

6- Martinez purposely excluded women and minorities from the jury

Peremptory challenge in law refers to a right in jury selection for the attorneys to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason.

http://www.supreme.state.az.us/jury/jury/jury1j.htm
28 U.S.C. §1870

 

 

7- Martinez accused men who testified for the defense of being in love with Jodi Arias

Samuels past history and unethical act brought that on, not Martinez. Samuels signed an agreement with the state of New Jersey, agreeing to desist and ceasing from crossing boundaries with clients and entering into relationships which may create conflict of interest with the client

 

 

8- Dr. Kevin Horn and Detective Esteban Flores altered their testimony

Martinez went back over this testimony and straightened out that confusion
(It was the Fog.) unlike the Defense who, after having witness after witness discredit themselves (Samuels, LaViolette, Searcy, Collins), did nothing but call prosecutorial misconduct.

 

 

9- Martinez continued to badger witnesses, with behaviors such as:

Arias’ defense attorneys filed numerous motions for mistrial alleging prosecutorial misconduct. All were denied by the judge.

 

 

10- Not allowing the Hughes emails into evidence

The Judge ruled them hearsay.

hearsay – “the report of another person’s words by a witness, usually disallowed as evidence in a court of law.”

 

 

11- Juan Martinez objected on 7 separate occasions during Kirk Nurmi’s closing argument

 “counsel is required to make both timely and specific objections and motions to strike the evidence in order to preserve the
objection for appellate review,’

” where the ground for objection is not apparent from the context of the discussion contained in the record.”

http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1321&context=plr

 

 

12- Juan Martinez lied during the penalty phase

The trial afforded Martinez a global audience. If he lied, somewhere someone with standing would have filed paperwork against him. They did not.

You data is wrong.

“it’s not just rare that one convicted of a crime and sentenced to life with parole doesn’t get paroled — it doesn’t happen — period! I have researched and researched, and can find no case in Arizona in which somebody sentenced to life with parole has actually been paroled.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/15/betty-smithey-released_n_1778434.html

Inmates on Parole – Arizona 2012 – 7460

Source: http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1997

 
13- More about the lynch mob surrounding the Jodi Arias trial and the witness tampering involved which tainted the jury after the failure of Sherry Stephens to sequester the jury

Where have you been? Trial-by-media lynch mob is nothing new.

http://articles.latimes.com/1989-01-24/news/mn-1075_1_ted-bundy

 
14- Not allowing Battered Woman’s Syndrome in despite the obvious abuse

Martinez: Isn’t it true that Mr. Alexander was extremely afraid of the defendant, Jodi Arias, based on her stalking behavior?

LaViolette: He was afraid of her, yes.

Martinez: Because of her stalking behavior, correct?

LaViolette: Correct.

 
15- Judge Sherry Stephens intimating to ignore her own personal bias

Judge Sherry Stephens (announce, state, proclaim, declare, make known, make public, publicize, disclose, reveal, divulge, set forth ) to ignore her own personal bias

What the hell are you even saying!?

 

 

Arias Myths Debunked – Debunked

Arias Myths CONFIRMED:

1. Arias is a slut.

That is a personal opinion and has nothing to do with the case. She and Travis BOTH were consenting Adults, not children.
However, she was sexually aggressive with Ryan the very first time she ever met him in person.
(http://youtu.be/TuWWBTNyFtw?t=13m06s)

 

2. Jodi stole the gun from her Grandparents –

The fact that Travis was shot with a .25 and the stolen gun was a .25 speaks volumes.

The fact that she disposed of the gun says it was the stolen gun.

SHE SAID IT HERSELF in the Interview with Det. Flores in June (10, 21, 25) that Travis did not have a gun.:

Flores: Was there, um, any kind of weapons, or was there a gun..
Arias: Um, his two fist really..
Arias: no he wasn’t one to keep any of that. No he was more into wrestling and UFC…

3. Arias is a Stalker:

Her OWN paid Expert said it:

Juan: Isn’t it true that Mr. Alexander was extremely afraid of the defendant, Jodi Arias, based on her stalking behavior?

Alyce: He was afraid of her, yes.

Juan: Because of her stalking behavior, correct?

Alyce: Correct.

4. : Jodi suffered from a fog, which really means she’s lying and guilty

She concocted three different stories. She cleaned up the crime scene. She covered up the crime. She tells it in her stories if you’d listen. Her lies are based somewhat on recalled memory, and she is consistent with that.

5. Sequestered Juries is not an Arias Myth.

SCRATCH.

6. Jodi Arias knew about the girl Alexander was meeting in Cancun and was jealous.

MOTIVE

She said it herself – 48 Hours Interview:

“that cancun trip, we had both known about it for over a year never once was it discussed that I wouldn’t be going with him.” (thats would NOT be going. She thought she was going right up until he told her she wasn’t, probably the last thing he ever said.)

7. Alexander didn’t own a gun.

SEE NUMBER 2

8. Alexander wasn’t abusive.

YOU said it yourself:”there is no proof Alexander was physically abusive.” 88,000 text/emails, four in anger. That is NOT verbal abuse.

Alyce said “He was afraid of her, yes.”

9. Jodi Arias was on a covert mission.

When you add up the Text between them, the fact that Travis had moved on, her professed love for Travis, the *coincidental gun theft from HER family, insistence on the light/white car, the hair dye, the planned trip to the PPL Convention/Ryans, the fact that she WENT to Mesa, the murder via MULTIPLE weapons, the coverup even after the event, it adds up.

10. Jodi was gracefully-adorned in court

She moused down to look innocent, yes. But that has nothing to do with anything.

11. Jodi shows no remorse

No, she doesn’t. What she did in that courtroom, save for the times she realized she was not going to get away with it, she has no remorse.

How hard is it to say “I’m sorry”?

http://youtu.be/xm06p8jTHjI

Arias Supporters in Death Throes

In keeping with the theme (Thank you Becky), allow the video to play while reading.

Webber of Lies

Oh what a tangled web we weave. When first we practice to deceive. – Sir Walter Scott

Recently the members of Barwoods Circus received information concerning the personal relationships of the Prosecuting Attorney in the Arias Murder Trial.  They failed to question it’s validity, and it’s source.  The Data gave Arias Supporters a little hope that the Guilty verdict could be reversed with the information.  Apparently, they don’t understand that the upcoming “Trial” is not about Arias’s guilt or innocence.  She has already been found Guilty.  The trial is for sentencing, to determine if she should get the Death Penalty.

The information was relayed via Sandra Webber of Inconvenient Truths, which seems quite odd since there are Official Arias websites they could have reported to.  They could have sent the data to the Mesa D.A.’s Office, had it been THAT viable.  But they didn’t.  They chose Webber to be their mouthpiece.  Webber, if you remember, was also the one that the questionable “Corinna Flores” twitter account decided to contact.  How…convenient.

How to Lose Friends and Execute Murderers

It seems that “someone’s” cell phone was lost, and that cell phone contained texts between two friends about an affair.  The screen shots that appeared show the number blocked out, and strangely, that the phone still shows as having service.  It is alleged that the information came from a source in the UK.   The cellphone somehow made it’s way across the Ocean and into the hands of someone who knew Webber.  Another “Coincidence” in the Arias trial?  I think not.

The Arias supporters now find themselves distracted from selling Arias Art and tshirts to help pay for her appeal.  They have literally turned their backs on Arias.  The only good thing to come from it is that George Barwood seems to have found religion as he has been seen quoting from the Holy Bible, and Sharia law.

How sad that this entire fiasco is seated in the jealousy of one friend toward another. I am sure that, in years to come, and FOR years to come, the woman that released the texts will rue her decision to attempt to trash the competition.  Unfortunately, it will be Arias that pays the bigger price for the pathetic attempt to discredit her childhood friend turned competition.

 

The Demise of the Last Standing Jodite

VNN has received word that the Walls of Jodite have fallen.

The Trojan Fish Plague hit the Jodites yesterday as rumor moved through the community like a fart in the wind.

Those infected had brief moments of elation followed by delusions, diarrhea of the mouth, and a strong urge to quote scripture.

VNN urges you to protect yourself by using this avatar on your Facebook profile:

In honor of the demise of the last standing Jodite,
we here at VNN offer you

FREE Printable Toilet Paper!

Here’s your Geebee Freebie!

 

 

 

In Her Own Words

“I write right now that

I love Travis Victor Alexander

so completely

that I don`t know any other way to be.”

                                                    – Jodi Arias

 

 

“that Cancun trip, we had both known about it for over a year

never once was it discussed that I wouldn’t (would NOT) be going with him.”
48 Hours Interview

 

 

 

“you can just see expressions on people`s faces and emotional moments.

I love capturing that sort of thing” – Arias

 

 

I’ve been going back over the crime scene pics, and I’ve changed my mind on the 62 Seconds of Rage. Something someone said about Travis’s head being up in that picture of her foot made me take yet another look.

We have all assumed that Travis was dead in that foot picture (center).   According to the time stamped images, the blood trace and her statements, that image was taken after he came out of the shower and before he made it down the hall.

If Travis had stepped out of the shower, body slammed her, chased her, and gone at her in the Linebacker stance when she shot him, as she claimed on the witness stand, how could she be standing on the wrong side of the bathroom in the foot picture one minute and two seconds after she “dropped” the camera?  Her back is to the closet/shower door in the foot image.  Based on that fact, she had plenty of opportunity to run down the hall and escape out the bedroom door while Travis was down.

The bullet trajectory, and her statements during the Interrogations, before she settled on using “self defense” at her trial, indicate Travis was shot in the shower.  The evidence shows he was not dead in that foot image.  Travis could have survived the gunshot to the face.  

3D Rendering – Gray Hughes

“He was kneeling down in the shower, I don’t remember, I was taking pictures, and I don’t really know what happened after that exactly, except I think he was shot.”

      “to my knowledge there was no blood in that bathroom, before that gunshot went off.”

In the foot shot, Travis appears to be holding his face. The blood that we can see has to be from that head shot.  His throat could not have been slashed at that point.  He would have bled out within seconds.  There would not have been the puddles of blood by the linen closet door, the blood spray in the sink or the stabbing throw off spatter that goes from the sink, to the blinds, to the toilet wall, to the puddle by the toilet room door.  He would not have been able to leave the blood trail going up the hall.

 

The very next picture that is snapped after the foot picture is of his shoulder.  We all have assumed that the image of Travis’s shoulder was snapped as he lay on his back in the hallway.  The Bathroom wall where the Linen Closet is, is the same wall that runs down the hallway.  The shoulder picture was taken one minute and sixteen seconds after the foot picture.  It was obviously taken while they were still in the bathroom.

Based on the blood spatter evidence and Aria’s statements, Travis was able to get up on his knees.  Arias stated several times that he was “on his all fours”.  Between the time he was shot and the time he was able to get up on his knees, based on the photographs, she had at least two minutes and eighteen seconds to leave.  Instead of leaving, she begins to stab him.

One of the many questions is “Why would he stand there at the sink and allow her to stab him?“.

Based on the wound evidence, her testimony, and the time stamped images, Travis could have been still on his all fours at the Linen closet when she began stabbing him in the back.  The angle of the blade indicates he was facing away from her.  The cluster indicates he wasn’t moving until after she stabbed him in the back at least five and up to nine times.

The blood and spatter around the sink indicates that Travis was able to pull up to and spit into the sink.  The gunshot would have caused blood to gush down his throat as well as out of his nose.   Blood would also have seeped through the tube from his throat to his right ear, where the concussion of the gun ruptured his eardrum.  The gunshot to the face also caused the extreme swelling to his eyes, and may well have caused him to have double vision, or be unable to see at all.

From this point, all we have to go on is the blood trace and the wounds to his body.

I noticed that the spatter on the left side of the sink seems to have been blocked by something.  Being as Arias is left handed, and she is adamant about her makeup, it appears that her purse was sitting on the counter at some point.  Arias states that her purse was on the dresser and it ended up on the bathroom floor.  Travis was right handed, so it seems logical that he would have used the sink on the left. His shaving utensils are located by the sink on the left.  She had plenty of time, from the time Travis was on his back in front of the shower, to the time he got up on his knees, to go get her purse.  OR, it may have been sitting there the whole time, with the gun, and maybe even the knife, concealed inside it.

 Based on the wounds inflicted to Travis and the blood spatter, it appears that he moved away from her from the sink to his left, toward the blinds.  She continued stabbing him from behind, twice, once on each side of the back of his neck.

 

Based on cast off, Travis could have been bent over at this point giving her access to his head. 

 She repeatedly states she was beside the tub.  She could have easily stepped up in front of him, inflicting the three shallow stabs to his neck.  They are shallow because she cut her hand when it slid down the blade as she scored his skull.

There are only a few specks of blood on the tub indicating she was there blocking the blood from the tub.  A pool of blood is left in that area, possibly from the gunshot wound, possibly from his head, as Travis is leaning over.

 

Evidence presented indicated that the faucet in the sink was turned on and off at some point.  It could indicate that she stepped to the sink to rinse her hand and inspect her cuts.  This could be when Travis slips past her and heads down the hall.  She stated that she ran down the hall in the “Intruder” story, and knocked the intruder over, causing the intruder to “trip over” Travis.

There is really only one spot that indicates arterial spray that could have come from the neck wound.  On the wall where her palm print was found, there is a spray of blood approximately three feet long and about four feet off the floor.  Travis was 5’9.  Jodi is 5’6.  The wound on Travis’s throat was cut high up under his chin, not down low on his neck.  I believe she ran up behind him and slit his throat, leaving the arterial spray and her palm print on the wall, where she steadied herself after the cut.

Travis went down to his right, slid sideways along the wall leaving the blood trace and ended up on his back.

Throw off spatter, and the fact that all the wounds to Travis’s chest and abdomen are uniform and horizontal, indicate that Travis was on his back when those wounds were inflicted.   A partial hand print can be seen on the wall to the left of the electrical outlet on the bedroom side of the wall. This could indicate that she was steadying herself and she squatted down to be able to inflict the seven horizontal stabs to his chest and abdomen.

Throw off Spatter

 

 

 

Travis lay there bleeding out, his brain calling for oxygen, his lungs heaving trying to meet the call for air.  That sound is something like a pig being slaughtered.

 

Arias showered, got dressed, waiting to ensure Travis was dead, then she shoved him into the shower, as is evident by her shoe prints.

 

Shot in the face,

14 stab wounds to the back side of his body,

two on the back at the top of his head that scored the skull,

7 wounds to his front torso with one being almost 6 inches at his navel,

defense wounds on his hands, mostly his left as his dominant hand was on his face,

slit throat

 

 

 

 

 

Blood Spatter Throw Off Comparison – Both areas

 

Answers

First off, those “three hours” being discussed, when she left Ryans.

 

He said “12-1am, maybe later, I don’t remember”…

 

so where do you get three hours?

 

Secondly, these are the dumbest questions I have ever read.

 

1. Why stage the gun theft as a burglary such that the police are immediately called and a record is created? Why not just “borrow” it? It might not be discovered missing for months and it probably wouldn’t be known exactly when it went missing.

She didn’t want anyone looking at her for it.  Had she “borrowed” it, she would have had to return it, and she had no intention of doing that.

 

2. Why, in her master plan to murder, would she change out the bullet type to one less powerful?

Because she is not gun savvy.  The term “Hollow point” may have led her to believe it was blanks.

 

3. Why visit friends in the rental car if its purpose was to travel in a car not connected with her?

She had to have some way of going.  She selected the lighter (white) car to be less noticed while there.  At least one individual that stayed there, or visited, had a white car.

 

4. Why borrow gas cans from someone who will mention them to the police, should he ever be questioned? Why not buy gas cans with cash in no-man’s land or in some large store where she’d be just one of many customers?

Two words:CASH FLOW.

 

 

5. Why does she make cell phone calls in Arizona heading north from Kingman toward Hoover Dam, thus negating the supposed reason for borrowing the gas cans?

How does making a phone call negate borrowing gas cans???

 

6. Why does she fill the cans in Salt Lake City if their purpose was to hide her trip into Arizona? Was she also hiding her trip home to Yreka?

She had just murdered a man.  it had been two days.  If Travis had been found, they might have been looking for her.  Besides, she’d used the gas she had.  She was being careful not to run out as per the way Daryl always did, remember?

 

7. Why tell Ryan she’s on her way if she’s already planning a six hour trip to Mesa and then at least another 10 hour trip to Salt Lake City? What kind of alibi is that?

She called him twice:

Ryan Burns testified Arias called him around 9 or 10 p.m. on June 3, 2008. She told him she was on her way to Utah. Burns expected her to arrive around 9 a.m. the next morning, Wednesday, June 4.

At 10:30 p.m. June 4th, Arias calls Burns to tell him she got lost but she’s on her way and will be in Utah by the morning.

 

8. Why go to the trouble of removing license plates to hide her presence at Travis’ house when it would have been infinitely easier to just drape something over it or park down the street?

Who’s committing this crime?  She’s doing it HER way!  An upside down tag wouldn’t get a second look from anyone (besides the Police, obviously), but if someone saw the car drive away, maybe because they heard the shot, they’d be hard pressed to get the number.  Parking down the street would negate the genius of the white car, now wouldn’t it.

 

9. Why didn’t she kill him upon arrival at 4 am? She’s already going to be late getting to her so-called alibi by at least five hours.

The deposit, sex, and she just drove a LONG way.  She was probably tired.

 

10. Why didn’t she shoot him (or quietly slit his throat) during the night when he was sleeping? Why wait until he’s fully awake with the capacity to then kill her instead?

First off, she was hoping he’d change his mind and take her to Cancun (two bottles of spf 15 lotion)

In HER words:

“you can just see expressions on people`s faces and emotional moments. I love capturing that sort of thing.”

11. Why have sex with him and leave her presence all over the crime scene?

Her DNA was already prominent in the house.  Plus, she washed the bedsheets.

12. Why have him take time-stamped photos of her and then not think to take the camera with her?

Because she deleted the images AND put it IN the washer.  She wasn’t about to take it with her.

13. Why would she first attack a man who has martial art skills and at least 60 pounds on her using a knife if she supposedly came with a gun?

As she stated over and over, she shot him first, in the shower, and the angle of the shot confirms that.

14. Why after supposedly stabbing him in the shower does she let him go stand at the sink?  If Travis had enough in him to go from the shower to the sink, stand there turning the faucet on and off while Jodi is supposedly stabbing him in the back, why didn’t he just turn around and smash her a good one?

She did not stab him in the shower.  She NEVER said that.  She said she SHOT him in the shower.

15. How would anyone, except the one controlling the attack, have the option to stop and stand at the sink?

He pulled up to the sink (she said he was on his all fours holding his face after she shot him IN THE SHOWER.  That is when she stabbed him in the back 14 times, and by the look of the arterial spray, slit his throat.  He didn’t survive long after that…just long enough for her to stab him 7 times in the chest and stomach (one wound 5 3/4 inches deep), and put FOUR “Defensive wounds” to his hands, mostly to his LEFT hand (he was right handed, and holding his face)

 

16. If he still had enough energy to travel down the hallway to the bedroom, why didn’t he just use that energy to stop all the stabbing she was supposedly doing?

He was already shot and cut.  He bled out what blood he had left right there in the hall, and she dragged him back into the shower.

 

17. Why did Travis have only four defensive wounds on his hands, only one on his dominant hand, and none on his lower arms if he was supposedly defending himself against a knife attack for more than a minute and perhaps up to two minutes?

He did not have time.  He was shot in the face, stabbed, and died, all in 62 seconds.

 

18. Upon leaving why wouldn’t she have noticed the license plate was upside down while supposedly screwing in those little fasteners?  Wouldn’t it be more possible for someone to notice her squatting behind the car thus drawing even greater attention to her presence? Certainly more likely than anyone noticing and remembering a license plate.

 

Because she wanted that tag upside down to make it hard for anyone to read the numbers.

 

19. How would ultimately arriving 24 hours late at Ryan’s house expect to establish an alibi?

She did not go to Utah to see Ryan.  She was scheduled to attend the PPL Convention.  Ryan was just a place to stay.
20. How is it Jodi came up with such a dumb plan but was then supposedly able to fool three experts with more than 90 years of collective experience in their respective fields?

Criminally Insane.

By %George! I think she’s got it!

Bravo!

“AN ELOQUENT RESPONSE TO GEORGE BARWOOD” By Jennifer Lambelet

June 18, 2014 at 1:42am

For the past month or so I’ve been dedicating my free time to re-watching the Jodi Arias Trial. Obviously I have been fascinated with this case and am looking forward to the upcoming penalty phase. This will be my critique of some information that has been posted on the web by a person who has chosen to become a loud, outspoken supporter of Jodi’s. According to what has been posted, this man is not from this country. As characterized by his writings, he lacks rudimentary knowledge of our court system as well as the details of this particular case. In fact, his knowledge is so lacking, it reminds me of Jodi’s own stupidity and arrogance.

For example, he has somehow come to the false conclusion that the state must disprove Jodi’s self-defense claim. Once a defendant claims self-defense the burden of proof actually shifts to the defense. He does not seem to understand that the state proved premeditated murder/murder in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. That destroys any chance of someone claiming self defense.

On his webpage he attempts to provide reasonable doubt for Jodi by breaking down the prosecution’s theory or theories.

There is an apparent lack of understanding concerning the phrase “reasonable doubt.” As this country witnessed in the Casey Anthony trial, some jurors lack clear understanding of this term as well. Anyone can have doubt. Doubt can be present concerning any theory or idea but not all doubt is valid or reasonable. I can have doubt in the theory of evolution but that does not make the doubt reasonable.

The first attempt to explain reasonable doubt concerns the robbery of Jodi’s grandparents’ home where it just so happens that a .25 handgun was stolen. Travis was shot with a .25 as well. The robbery itself was odd and that was noted by the police and the officer also testified. Only four rooms were involved in this so-called robbery where only four items were taken, one from each room. One item was a DVD player (more on this later). Oh, and did I forget to mention that Jodi was the last person to be at the home before it was “robbed”?

The Jodi-supporter (whom I will not name), tells us that Yreka had a number of burglaries in the same area that year. Indeed there do appear to be a number of robberies in the Yreka area in the year of 2008. It looks as though Yreka is not exactly the safest place to be in general. Since 2006, Yreka has consistently rated above the national average in violent crime.

Violent crime rate in 2008
Yreka:
319.3
U.S. Average:
252.4

However, this raw statistic tells us nothing about the circumstances surrounding any of these robberies. Were all the robberies consistent, taking only a few items here and there? Were the items typically small handguns? Were the robbers arrested and charged? Showing high robberies in an area that has consistently rated higher than national average for crimes is simply an anomaly that shows us nothing. In fact, Yreka’s crime rate remains high up until the last year they are listed – 2012.

This man then points to the fact that Jodi was never charged with the robbery as some type of evidence that she could not have committed the crime. Lack of evidence is not evidence. Again, this can produce doubt but it is reasonable doubt? No. Travis was specifically shot with a .25 caliber handgun and that is not a common caliber. Perhaps a .22 or a .45 but .25 is not typical. Even if it were the most common caliber, the idea that Travis was shot with the same caliber of gun stolen from Jodi’s grandparents – the same woman who initially tried to deny even being in Arizona, and lied again about intruders – is not a coincidence. It is just another factor in proving premeditation.

Unfortunately the jury was not fully disclosed on a certain event that took place while visiting Darryl Brewer. On the stand Darryl specifically testified that Jodi had to return to his house to give him the remote control for his DVD player. Jodi confirmed this fact as well. So what is Darryl’s DVD remote control doing in Jodi’s car? She traded the DVD player she stole in the robbery for the two cans. She borrowed nothing and that’s why the gas cans were never returned.

Obviously Jodi’s grandparents were not going to testify against their own granddaughter. Ultimately when personal property is stolen, it’s often left up to the victim to decide whether or not they are going to press charges. Many times victims will discover who stole from them and choose not to press charges because they know the person or it might not otherwise be in their best interest. In this case, it’s obvious the grandparents were not going to push any further and without their cooperation of identifying the stolen item(s), charges would likely be dropped. The idea that because she was never charged with this burglary somehow exonerates her from the crime is an absurd conclusion to make.

I can imagine how bad it would look to ask Jodi’s grandparents to testify against her and identify their property. I can understand that her grandparents would be extremely hurt and confused over what Jodi has done. Murder does not just affect the victim’s family. Jodi’s family is hurting as well. Surly the prosecutor knows this and probably did not see reason to drag them into this any further. Of course there could be other reasons as well but one thing is for certain – a compromise was made somewhere. The fact that Jodi had that DVD player is absolute proof she took the gun as well.

As far as the ammunition is concerned, the police report indicates the gun carried hallow points. I do believe it’s clear that Travis was shot with a round tip and not a hollow point. There seems to be some concern that since there was different ammunition used that it somehow confirms Jodi didn’t use her grandparents’ gun. This is ludicrous. We don’t know if there was no other ammunition.

According to Jodi she knew several people with guns. There are many possibilities involved in how she could have acquired different bullets. It’s also very possible and plausible the grandparents were just mistaken and hollow points never were in the gun to begin with. It’s also possible that Jodi knew enough about ammunition she purposely chose to obtain different bullets in order to ensure that the bullets would not be linked back to her grandparents.

We know she stole the gun. The DVD player she gave to Darryl, the fact that she was the last person that was at the home, and Travis receiving a shot from a .25 caliber are overwhelming evidence. There is no doubt that could be classified as reasonable.

My theory is that she wavered in the idea of using a gun for Travis. Ultimately I believe she decided she needed the gun because she knew she was going to be going out into the dessert, alone, and driving at night. Using the gun on Travis would have been too quick and too loud. Jodi liked knives. Just like slashing a tire, Jodi would slash Travis and make him feel the pain. Remember, Jodi is always reminding us how horrible Travis treated her.

A side note: I’m not much into conspiracy theories or information that sounds bizarre or delusional however, the Mormon church apparently has a history of killings whereby the sinner had their throat slashed. Is it possible that Jodi may have known this and decided this would be a good way to off Travis? Or did she chose this gruesome method in order to have it appear that the killer was male?

Another hilarious point this Jodi supporter tries asserting is that Travis may have owned a gun but didn’t tell anyone and he further supports this by saying, “The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” The absence of evidence is NOT evidence. There is no evidence that Travis owned a gun. Ever. No ammunition was found, no holster, no gun cleaner, no other gun paraphernalia was found at his home. Not only that but roommates were not cognizant his ownership, no friends were familiar, no family was aware. Travis has a sister who is a police officer; would it not make perfect sense for him to contact her and ask her for information on gun ownership? Travis had friends who owned guns and yet not one of them knew that he owned a gun.

We can see that Travis was very particular about his belongings. Pictures depict a man who was very clean and orderly. The location of where Jodi claims this gun was is odd and certainly not anywhere easy to access for personal protection. She also claims that she found the gun initially while cleaning. I cannot think of anyone who owns a gun that would be so stupid as not to warn someone going through their stuff that a gun was present. I happen to know many people who own guns, including myself and all of them are quite vocal about the presence of a gun inside their home. It is natural to make guests aware that there are firearms on the property.

I never knew Travis personally but there is no way that man owned a gun and ignorantly tossed it on a high shelf in his closet, chose to tell no one, had no other items associated with gun ownership, and didn’t bother to tell the woman cleaning his closet nor his roommates that he owned a gun. Hogwash.

It was discussed during the trial that Travis purchased his new camera with the advice of his roommate; Jodi claims he consulted with her. From this bit of information we can see that Travis is careful in his purchases. Travis had friends who indeed owned guns. Again, his sister works in law enforcement. I cannot think of too many people who would recommend a .25 caliber to use for personal protection. Again, this is not just an uncommon caliber; it is certainly not common for defense.

Everything Jodi has testified to that concerns this gun has been downright dishonest. She tried insisting the gun was not loaded, then she said she didn’t know if the gun was loaded, she even tried saying she knew the gun was loaded at some time. Now why would Travis the “abuser” tell Jodi “his victim” where he stored his gun? We know of course that when she first spoke with Det. Flores that she specifically said Travis never owned a gun. Why? It’s because she did not know her story would morph into the nonsense it eventually did. She never thought of claiming self-defense until she was backed into a corner with all her lies and she continues to lie.

On top of all this, we have this ridiculous story she told about stepping onto a shelf in the middle of a chase and retrieving this handgun that may or may not be loaded (depending on what story you believe from Jodi). We know the shelves are floating or resting shelves that merely rest on pins. There is absolutely nothing sturdy about them and they can only hold around 40 pounds. Her claims demand that she stepped onto a shelf in order to grab the gun but doing this would not only take more time than she postulates, it would have flipped the shelf upwards causing her injury and creating a mess in the closet. This action could have also forced the pins to snap, breaking the shelf off. Jodi should have stated she levitated to retrieve the gun; that would be a more probable story than the lies she’s telling now.

When we take all this information in its context we can see that it is highly improbable that Travis owned a gun. The fact that there literally is NO information corroborating this claim concludes that this claim cannot be made.

Overwhelming evidence proves Jodi indeed brought the .25 and it came from the home she was living in located in Yreka. Any doubt to this fact is just reckless doubt and nothing to do with being reasonable.

Second issue is the fact that Jodi rented a car 90 miles away from Yreka. The supporter then lists why there is reasonable doubt that this was part of premeditation. Apparently he forgot to watch the trial.

Jodi claims she rented from Budget because it was the cheapest; she found the rate through Priceline. Martinez waited till the end but finally exposed Jodi’s lie. After Travis’ death, Jodi purchased an airline ticket through Priceline in order to attend his memorial service. Priceline is listed as the specific vendor on her bank records. Those same records show Budget, not Priceline. The man who testified from Budget, Mr. Colombo, said Jodi booked her reservation through him directly and again the bank records support this.

Jodi insisted that she booked the rental car through another website. Priceline is just one of many. However, even if she did not go through Priceline, her bank records would have indeed reflected the website she did book through. The reason is to make certain that a small commission is given to the site that booked the reservation; it’s how those companies make money.

Jodi also decided to argue about whether she was accompanied by a male or not. Mr. Colombo from Budget was an excellent witness and recalled specifically that Jodi was with a man. Jodi testified that either her brother’s neighbor or sister-in-law dropped her off at the airport and she does not have memory of anyone being at the counter with her. This is just another part of her testimony where she simply cannot help but lie; she must argue any and all points.

So we know she purposely rented the car 90 miles away and yes she used her proper identification to rent the vehicle. She also protested when initially offered a red car, claiming that red cars receive more tickets.* She was then given a white Ford Focus. We also know she went to Budget blonde and told the man working there she was just going to be driving in the area. Even IF she supposedly did not know she was going to Mesa, she knew she was going to Utah; she purposely LIED, just like she always does.

Are these car rental issues the nail on the coffin for Jodi? No, when considering these particular issues, they add up to being quite trivial, but they are a part of a string of events that indeed show premeditation was involved. She wanted to be identified as a  blonde because she had plans of dying her hair. She did not want to rent a car in her area because it’s a smaller town where people would recognize her. She needed another car in hopes of not drawing the attention of Travis’ neighbors.

Extra stuff not considered by Jodi supporters:

There was a man who appeared on television claiming that Jodi borrowed money from him for this trip. I’m not sure why he was not called to testify; perhaps the prosecutor did not feel his testimony was needed. Jodi herself admitted to being on a tight budget and cited this as one reason for carrying gas cans.

Prior to leaving she apparently visits the bank and makes deposits; she moves money around from her business account to her personal account. Her odd explanation for these transactions reveal that she was practicing a scam. I believe it’s called “floating.” You take money you don’t have and loan it to yourself, giving the appearance of a balance in the other account [business to personal account]. This gives the person a few days to make a real cash deposit to cover the loan before it clears either account. If Jodi is so tight on money, why take this trip at all? Why is she asking for money from others, floating checks, and then getting a wax plus her nails done? Why was she in such a rush to take this trip? 

Not only should we consider these factors, let us also contemplate another reason she cited for taking this trip. She states that Darryl’s sister had just had her baby and Jodi wanted to take pictures for her yet, she never contacts her and quickly leaves the area before his sister contacted her. Jodi’s own actions tell us that her trip was not just to see Ryan but there was something here that indicates time was of the essence. 

Let’s discuss gas cans for a minute…

First of all there is nothing too extraordinary about having gas cans when a person is traveling. Back in the day (long time ago), it was common for West coast folks to have gas cans when traveling. People from Arizona often travel back and forth to California. They enjoy going to the beach for the weekend, going on a short road trip. I’m sure as time has gone by this gas-can-carrying practice might not be as common as it once was.** However, the idea that Jodi wanted gas cans by itself is pretty meaningless. What is troublesome is when you pair this information with all the other known facts, a more sinister picture begins to take form.

She was planning to go to Mesa and she most certainly wanted to make sure that there was no paper trail of her getting gas inside of Arizona. She kept the receipts in order to prove her whereabouts, or so she thought. Just the fact that she kept these receipts, making record of them the way she did is proof she was trying to cover up for something. She did what she did to leave a specific trail.

Her own mother was questioned about the murder and said specifically that Jodi told her she was nowhere near Arizona – Jodi told her, “I have the gas receipts!” This proves she was planning on keeping those receipts for her alibi. Check out around 10:35: (See :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMaTDrBqZ6g)

Yet, even after all this nonsense we haven’t even discussed the third gas can. We know she had a third gas can because she admitted to buying it. She specifically told Martinez she went back, almost immediately, to the SAME Walmart in Pasadena and returned the can. Of course we discover that the Walmart had absolutely no such record. Anyone who has ever returned an item to Walmart knows you have to provide a signature before you are given any money. During the trial, no questions from the defense were offered for the Walmart employee. During closing argument, Nurmi could only try and muster up some story that Jodi may have returned the can elsewhere — another lie that probably was fed to him by Jodi since she is unable to keep track of all her lies. (See : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s28xtQf9m24)

Further proof that she never returned the third can was revealed when her receipts for gas in Salt Lake City were presented to her. All three purchases were confirmed to be fuel purchases and those total gallons amounted to more than her capacity, had she only been carrying only two cans. It can further be speculated she needed additional gas not just to travel but perhaps burn evidence i.g. weapons, clothes, etc. when she was washing off and changing in the dessert.

Now let’s add to ALL this the fact that her phone magically shuts off just before Arizona and then she magically finds the phone charger after she’s done with her murderous deed. This isn’t bad luck. Bad luck of this caliber is planned and executed. Also Ryan Burns testified that Jodi told him she had to purchase another phone charger. Just another situation demonstrating Jodi’s compulsion to lie.

She had bad luck with her car rental issues, her gas cans, and her phone, she also has trouble with her licence plates. Come on, people! If you haven’t figured out how ridiculous this is by now, you are living in a dream world.

Jodi took off the front plate and put the rear plate upside down. This was obviously done for the purposes of making it difficult for anyone to take down a plate number. Jodi is not bright in the slightest so it would not shock me if she truly did believe the police would not notice so quickly. Her story about the plates like all other stories has changed. She initially told the police officer who pulled her over that her friends must have played a joke on her. She told Ryan Burns the plates were manipulated at a Sinclair’s she visited. Now of course we have the story about the screw driver-wielding skateboarders at Starbucks.

Sure, it’s very possible that skate boarders are carrying screw drivers. Initially I thought this sounded odd but with a little research I discovered that this might be probable. I believe they do so to always ensure their wheels are affixed, tightened. Yet why would these skateboards choose her car to play a prank on? According to Jodi she had just went into Starbucks to get a drink and came right back out. Isn’t it more likely for them to choose a vehicle that had been sitting there for quite sometime? The prank itself is pointless and stupid. It would make much more sense to remove both plates, not take the time to fasten one upside down. Why not just steal the plates if you’re going to be removing them? This entire scenario is just like everything else Jodi makes up – stupid.

Jodi testified that she noticed something shiny while pulling out of the parking space. This would place the object at the front of where the vehicle was. Why wasn’t she looking in her review mirror or looking out toward the back of the car, where a normal person looks in order to back up into the parking lot? She then claims she actually got out of the car to examine the shiny, reflective object she only then discovered to be a license place,  picked up the plate and threw it in her passenger floorboard. The entire story was questioned by Martinez and he did a great job at exposing her lie here.

If she knew she had gotten out of the car and grabbed this plate, why would she then tell the police officer, who later pulled her over concerning the back plate being upside down in Utah that her “friends must be playing a trick on her”? Why would she tell Burns something else about Sinclair’s? Why not tell them the SAME story concerning her experience at Starbucks? It’s because it NEVER happened. Again, the bad luck Jodi claims can only be manufactured.

For those that want to say Ryan Burns is “full of crap,” as Jodi poignantly describes, I have to ask, “Why?” Ryan Burns has absolutely nothing to gain by lying about what Jodi told him. In addition the police officer from Utah who pulled Jodi over seemed to have great recollection – this was the only time in his very long career as a public servant to have observed an upside down plate. He surly would remember the story Jodi told him. Never once did he waver in his story, nor did he seem the slightest unsure. Jodi has routinely offered up different stories and this situation concerning the plates is no different. The only one full of crap is Jodi.

The next area of concern among Jodi supporters has to do with when she killed Travis. Again, for whatever reason these folks are not too bright, they purposely ignore information that doesn’t suit them, or they are liars themselves. Travis had a roommate that was home until around 6 AM when he finally left for work. Jodi was not going to kill Travis immediately, knowing someone was in the home. In fact, the evidence seems to suggest that Jodi was still fishing for an invitation to Cancun, which is most likely the reason she was in such a rush to get down there.

There are a few things here that were not revealed to the jury and apparently these facts are too much for Jodi-supporters to even bother acknowledging. First, Jodi was initially listed as Travis’ companion for the trip to Cancun. So when Jodi says she was never considered as his traveling companion she is lying – AGAIN. Her name was later removed at the beginning of May and this fact alone may have angered Jodi. Second, before arriving in AZ Jodi apparently made some purchases for sun block and facial cleanser. These items seem to suggest that she was still hoping to change Travis’ mind and perhaps talk him into being his companion once again.

No matter what you believe about Jodi, there is no denying she suffers from some sort of severe mental problem, as do all those who plan and execute murder and/or other crimes. She may have borderline personality disorder; I believe she is more of a sociopath who displays borderline traits. Trying to make sense out of a sociopath’s or borderline’s behavior is futile. We do know a few things that cannot be disputed. She was not going to kill him knowing his roommate was there and she was interested in having one last romp session with him since this is entirely what their relationship was based upon – s-x. There is nothing unusual about a woman who sleeps with a man immediately before killing him because we have seen this type of behavior among women killers before.

Many of Jodi’s supporters cannot believe she would first sleep with Travis prior to killing him because they are quite ignorant of these type of crimes. The particular supporter that I have mentioned goes further in suggesting that woman do not kill unless they have some great reason to do so. Again, just another demonstration of pure ignorance on his part.

Jodi was obsessed with Travis. The idea of him being with another woman, going on another trip with another woman was something Jodi was not going to tolerate. If Jodi could not get what she wanted out of Travis, she really no longer had any use for him. She was put into a metaphorical box by Travis and this is clearly something she was not willing to accept. She was good for phone play, physical play, and friendship but she was not good enough to marry. Furthermore, Travis was demanding that she pay up for the money she owes him concerning the BMW that was ruined.

Jodi was in financial ruin. Her car was about to be repossessed. Her credit was destroyed from neglecting her house payments leading to foreclosure. The BMW was destroyed and of course Jodi has a story about how it was not her fault; it was the movers who attached the vehicle to the moving truck and supposedly put it in first gear rather than neutral. Of course Jodi felt no responsibility and had no interest in actually paying back Travis.

Let’s be clear that the BMW story is a bunch of crap as well…

According to Jodi (which we can pretty much guarantee that she’s lying), the movers or person that helped her attach the car to the back of the truck for towing are the ones who left the car in first gear. I don’t even see how this is possible. First you have to manipulate the vehicles in proximity for the car to be attached. Usually you drive the car right up to the rear of the moving truck and then you have to put the car in neutral to get a good alignment. Let’s just say I’ve done this a few times but especially someone working for a moving truck company, they would routinely help many people do this sort of action and there is no way I am buying this idea they allowed the car to remain in first gear. Again, you have to put the car in neutral in order to properly attach it.

Jodi destroyed this car all on her own. She wanted to stay in Mesa and she wanted Travis to allow her to move in with him. He refused. This is why they had a huge fight before she left. Travis may not have figured out initially that she destroyed the car on purpose but Jodi was angry that Travis would not allow her to move in. Putting all the pieces together, this is the only story that makes sense.

Sociopaths are obsessed with two things – money and status. Sociopaths are also unable to internalize responsibility. They can and will always find a way to place the blame onto others around them. Jodi viewed Travis as the source of all her problems. Jodi truly believes that had she never met Travis, she would have not given up on Darryl, been baptized Mormon, stopped paying on her house, still had a vehicle, never moved to Mesa, would not be living back in Yreka with her grandparents — it was ALL Travis’ fault and here he wants to take some Mimi with him to Cancun, a trip that she was supposed to go on?! After all, Travis and Jodi had been travelling together in order to go to all these different places to see before they die. How could he do this to her?

Immediately shooting Travis when she arrived or doing so while he slept would have been much too anti-climatic for Jodi. She wanted to see him suffer; she wanted him to know she was his killer. Nothing else would satisfy her and using s-x in order to get Travis into a vulnerable position was nothing different from what she had always done before. She used s-x to get whatever she wanted from Travis and this was no different.

I do believe that even if Travis had decided to take her to Cancun, his murder would have only been delayed; Jodi would have gladly killed him when they returned from Cancun.

As far as taking pictures, everyone was well aware of Jodi’s interest in photography. She would not have used her own camera, this would put evidence in her hands proving she was in Mesa. Remember, her whole plan was initially being able to deny ever being near or around Mesa. I believe she was very interested in having an opportunity to use Travis’ camera and there may have been a bit of jealousy precipitated by Travis purchasing this camera. Travis wanted to buy a camera better than Jodi’s, just to show that he could do so. This could have been a bit of a competitive jab, maybe even a passive aggressive act on his part. Jodi was indeed envious and promptly took offense to this act. “Why didn’t he buy HER the camera?” Jodi probably asked this in her own mind, fuming because she feels a natural entitlement to anything Travis has. Travis himself seems to have been a bit of a show-off so it simply would not surprise me if he really did buy this particular camera as a way of rubbing it in Jodi’s face.

Here again we see the naive and ignorant nature of Jodi’s failed plan to walk out of Travis’ home committing the perfect murder. Jodi knew Travis told people of his new camera purchase and that occurred after Jodi went back to Yreka. She knew she could not take the camera with her because a missing camera would immediately cast suspicion upon her. Yes, Jodi ignorantly believed that nobody would suspect her because she was now living miles away in Yreka and of course she was lost in the dessert before arriving in Utah during his murder. It would be impossible for her to be involved, donchaknow?

Without a doubt Jodi believed she destroyed that camera and all the pictures by putting that camera into the laundry, adding bleach, and running a cycle. The act of deleting to her meant just that and she underestimated the technology and intelligence of everyone else around her just like she always does, which is exactly what makes her a stupid individual.

When Det. Flores told her there were images found on the camera, Jodi herself could not hide her utter shock and fear; her voice dropped and her mouth pursed the word, “Really?” This was one of the only truthful moments of Jodi’s interrogation and Flores knew he had her attention at that point. Still, Jodi tried to carry on and suggest that she was never there.

Jodi chose to stab Travis first because she wanted him to feel pain and torture. She wanted him to feel out of control and helpless. She was also determined to get him out of her life. I do believe the knife was perhaps placed under the bathmat. There is a reason she is fixated on the bathmat and she continually brings it up. Also forensics testimony concluded that the bathmat was moved at some point. I’m not sure what else to think about this mat but she certainly made it clear it was of significance.

I will speculate on my version of events later on but in the meantime I will finish up with discussing Jodi supporters so-called points of reasonable doubt. Okay, so where was I? Yes…

Next up, we go back to Ryan Burns. Jodi-supporters suggest that he was not an alibi because she had arrived a day later and there was no reason for him to be an alibi. Again, they still are stuck on stupid and believe Jodi to be intelligent. No, Jodi is an idiot who absolutely believed that she could tell everyone she was going on a trip to Utah, get “lost” while covering up the fact that she was actually in Arizona killing Travis, “find” herself and carry on with Ryan Burns as if nothing happened. She even called Travis’ phone and sent him text messages, emails, in order to make it seem as though she had no idea what was going on and that he was killed.

Going over to Ryan Burn’s house and acting normal was all apart of her plan from the very beginning. She was going to make sure that nobody would believe she had anything to do with his murder because she was nowhere near Arizona and she could also say she wasn’t jealous or stuck on Travis, after all, she was moving on with another man.

Unfortunately for this particular Jodi supporter, he lacks any and all understanding of what reasonable doubt actually means. He is failing to put all the pieces of the puzzle together because he actually has bought into some absurd idea that woman do not commit first degree murder. He also has convinced himself that Jodi is one unlucky person and all of these details and all of this information that we have amounts to poor Jodi just being a victim of general circumstances.

This Jodi-supporter also believes that Jodi could not possibly be lying because somehow that would mean she fooled three experts. I can only assume he is talking about LaViolette, Samuels, and Geffner. Fooled? These experts were the fools of this entire case and Martinez clearly exposed them. Both Samuels and LaViolette had crossed ethical boundaries when they purchased books for Jodi and LaViolette actually apologized to Jodi for doing her job – she read Jodi’s journals.

The other quack Geffner has been accused of being a hired gun in his past and it was established that he did not see Jodi at all; he merely went over the reports that were a part of Jodi’s case/evaluations.

I am not an expert in Psychology. I did do exceptionally well in an undergraduate Psychology course. While I do not have any experience in testing or doing evaluations, I am trained in the area of science. There was great dispute as to the validity of Jodi’s PDS test (Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale), which tests for the presence of PTSD or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

During the trial we learned that this particular test asks the taker (in this case Jodi), to indicate a specific event, a trauma that has affected them and follows up with general questions that are related to the event that is given by the test taker. When Jodi originally took this test she was diagnosed with PTSD however, it was discovered that at this time she was still telling her lawyers and everyone else that would listen, the story about the two intruders who attacked her, held her at gunpoint, and took Travis’ life. Ultimately this was the “event” that she was answering questions about and therefore if the event was a proven lie, any of the questions pertaining to this fictionalized event would be equivalent to more fiction making the PTSD diagnosis void.

The defense put up their experts and consequently they tried to argue that even though the actual event did not occur, she could have been answering questions about the “self-defense” event and therefore the results are still valid. Of course we already know that the self-defense event never occurred either. It is just another one of Jodi’s fantasies and an attempt to avoid taking responsibility for her actions.

The very idea that you could take a test and list an event that never occurred yet somehow arrive at a correct conclusion is bizarre and not scientific. Not only is this illogical, it is insulting to a person of average intelligence.

Testing is the only way to truly gain insight. In Psychology, testing demands that the person taking the test is being honest and fully disclosing proper information. Psychology is a difficult area because there does not seem to be any true independent, objective methods that can produce clear, reproducible results. I cannot go to a Psychologist and have them run a test (like a blood test), so they can tell me I suffer from PTSD, depression, a personality disorder, etc. Instead, I will be asked questions that rely on my honesty. It’s the best method that we currently have. When someone is being dishonest and it has been proven by the person themselves (in Jodi’s case she is now using an entirely different story), the results become null and void. The defense asked us to look past the initial deception and then believe a conclusion made by an intermediary, subjective source. Fortunately the jury was smart enough to understand this.

Jodi’s lies fall apart: (See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_TCy2_816Y)

Watch for the most classic moment beginning at around 55:25. Martinez had Jodi confirm her only visible injury from the murderkilling was her cutting her ring finger. Soon after, Jodi starts dancing and pretending like Juan was speaking of another time, how she didn’t know what he was talking about.

I do believe Day 25 is the most compelling part of Jodi’s time on the witness stand. There is so much to say about this particular day and even more to say about her behavior, rather than what she testified to. Jodi cannot even bear to look at Martinez. Perhaps she really was feeling the weight of her lies during this day. Could she have finally understood how utterly ridiculous and implausible her story is? Nah, probably not. She’s not that smart. She’s still confused as to why nobody believes her lies.

Courtesy : http://www.the-alternative-conservative.com/2014/06/jodi-arias-my-response-to-absurdity.html

Thanks to Jilted Jodi and Alyce

We don’t NEED you to Crusade for DV Laws Barwood.

Stick to your OWN country!

*SPIT*

•  There is NO example in the HISTORY of ANY country where a victim of domestic violence fought back and killed their abuser using MULTIPLE WEAPONS. PROVE ME WRONG.Jodi was JILTED. Straight up. She went there with intent to kill him. She said HOW she did it over and over again.SHE had that gun to HIS head as he was on the floor.

  “It’s like everything just stops. When you — when someone else is sitting there with a gun pointed to your head deciding your fate.” – Arias

  we were in the middle of the bathroom I pointed it at him with both of my hands. – Arias

  Defense wounds on the PALM of his left hand, a SLICE to his right hand/thumb where he was holding his face

  Travis was on all fours on the tile — and well, I say all fours, but one of his hands was actually holding his head.” – Arias

  “He was, like, on his knees like this doing something like this or something like — I don’t know.” – Arias

  She ran down the hall and hit him knocking him down (Blood smear on wall)

  I ran down that hall and I pushed her as– as hard as I could and she fell over him – Arias

  There WAS no domestic violence EVER on the part of Alexander. PERIOD. Not ONE incident. HIS tires were slashed, TWICE. SHE moved to Mesa. SHE spied on him. SHE texted his girlfriends. SHE drove to Mesa that night. SHE inflicted 27 stab wounds and the gunshot to his face because HE did not want her anymore. He wanted to move on. HE had a life. SHE did not.
•   “There is no example in the history of crime of a sane woman premeditating murder by a week for a motive as weak as jealousy”. That is THE most pitiful, pathetic, ignorant comment in the history of the Arias trial.
•  Here are some FACTS for you George:

  Did you know…
• One in four women: An analysis of 10 separate domestic violence prevalence studies found consistent findings: 1 in 4 women experience domestic violence over their lifetimes and between 6-10% of women suffer domestic violence in a given year (Council of Europe, 2002).http://www.womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-articles…

  

  Statistics: how common is domestic violence? – Women’s Aid

  www.womensaid.org.uk

  Articles: domestic violence – Women’s Aid

  How about YOU go rescue the victims in your OWN Country. We’ve got this.
• 12.9 million incidents: The British Crime Survey found that there were an estimated 12.9 million incidents of domestic violence acts (that constituted non-sexual threats or force) against women and 2.5 million against men in England and Wales in the year preceding interview (Walby & Allen, 2004).
•  IN YOUR COUNTRY:

  Repeat victimisation is common. 44% of victims of domestic violence are involved in more than one incident. No other type of crime has a rate of repeat victimisation as high (Dodd et al, July 2004).

• WE DON’T NEED YOUR INPUT:

  Resources Up, Murders Down

  In the United States, rates of homicide by
  intimate partners—spouses, ex-spouses,
  boyfriends, and girlfriends—have fallen
  over the past 25 years

   

  https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/jr000250.pdf

Credibility – Arias Supporters DUPED!

The Jodi Arias Case:

Over the last several months I’ve been witness to behavior from adults that makes the fits of a toddler and the rebelliousness of a teenager seem like Birthday Parties (and I had the nerve to be shocked at the behavior of those during the NOT MOM debacle).  SMH

I’ve watched people exploiting the primaries and the family members of this case, this time as witnesses to the inhumanity instead of a victim.

NOT my first FISH Fry, so to speak

I did not get that involved with the Arias case.  I was only interested in the CSI and Forensics part of it due to what I witnessed during the Zimmerman/Martin case.  My attentions were turned to the people discussing the case by my meeting a woman named Bevvie.  (I don’t CARE what you think about her, so there will be NO bullcrap in the comments.)  It was because of her that I was drawn into the realm of the Arias Trial Online.

Before I go any further in writing this, I want to make something perfectly clear:

There is not ONE reason in all of the Universe that justifies

using a minor child as a tool to harm another.  

EVER.

 *Flicks tail*

 

 

I feel compassion for the Alexander and Arias families .  Not only do they have to deal with every emotion a human being can experience…they have to deal with idiots who feel free to post vile comments and nasty meme’s about the parties of the case.  I have labeled the perpetrators of this behavior the “Travites” and the “Jodites“.

 

Travites are the ones that agree with the verdict.   They are separated only by their difference of opinion on the Death Penalty.  They have the verdict they wanted.  If they want to sit there and type out what a “enter your choice of profanity here” Jodi is, FINE.  They have no cause to fight for.  What they type is a direct reflection of who they are at that moment.  I suggest that they try to recognize that evil and tame it before they use it on someone they love.

 

The Jodites…to quote a friend “Lord love a duck”.  When a few key players were asked “What’s the plan to save Jodi”…well, anyone who has read this blog knows what the responses were.  Nobody knew anything other than “Love ya girl”, “wiki wiki wiki”, “Read my blog/website”, “buy my book/ebook”.   It has become nothing more than a pissing contest.  SJ, of Jodiariasisinnocent (I’ll address SJ later) CONCURS:

 

 

The Jodites, on the other hand,  DO have a cause to fight for.  That’s the primary reason the hate they spew will cause harm, not to THEM, but to JODI ARIAS, who is fighting for her very life.  Do they think this is a big joke?  Apparently so.  The following meme was posted to their number one website, jodiariasisinnocent.com.

(MEME EDITED VERSION.  I couldn’t stand to look at it any longer)

This meme effectively REMOVES any credibility of the website and the webmaster.

Let’s talk “Credibility” for a moment.  Credibility, in the Oxford Dictionary, is defined as “The quality of being trusted and believed in”.  It is something that I have YET to find among the most prominent supporters of Jodi Arias.  Lot of good YOU people do her!

Besides the people I have listed on this blog (who’s credibility is overshadowed by that pissing contest mentioned on the support website), there’s the webmaster for JodiAriasisInnocent.com, someone called SJ.

 

 “Simon Johansson is, in fact, Simon John Hill of Barnsley, South Yorkshire,

a con artist whose easy-money schemes stretch back years”.

Now, I  understand that people are cruel online and they’ll post things to websites to discredit a person, something like this:

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/jodiariasisinnocentcom/internet/jodiariasisinnocentcom-Jodi-Arias-Murderer-Slanderer-Liar-Psychopath-Disgrace-Inhum-1027323

BUT, they did NOT post these articles:

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-1614558/Hetherington-Trickster-with-the-silver-tongue.html

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-1590769/Swedish-wealth-creator-from-Barnsley.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series9/week_one.shtml

http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series7/free_land.shtml

I’ll be adding more as we go along.

The Barwood Mating Call

The Barwood Mating call goes something like this:

“Wiki wiki, wikiwikiwiki, wiki wiki wiki wiki“

Here it is:

https://youtu.be/OZ2dCQ9xEGM

“The Leak”!, or should we say, “The clot thickens!”

George Barwood

Yesterday at 1:28pm

Hypocrisy Never Ceases to Amuse Me | The Jodi Arias Art Gallery

Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are cautioned…

JODIARIAS.COM

Like ·  · Share

• Seen by 15

  2 people like this.
• 

  Casandra Picanco I have to ask, mail like this does not get through to Jodi does it? I mean I would like to think “hate mail” gets weeded out of the pile of mail she actually receives. Someone please tell me I am right!

  22 hours ago · Like
• 

  George Barwood No, Jodi will see it I think. I think it’s only a small proportion of her mail though.

  22 hours ago · Like
• 

  Casandra Picanco That to me is terrible. If the mail gets scanned anyway, why not eliminate the hate mail?

  22 hours ago · Like · 1
• 

  Sandra Webber Hey George, you took a screenshot of Jodi’s letter to you and it’s out. You got some splain’ to do.

  20 hours ago · Like · 1
• 

  Sandra Webber Who would eliminate hate mail, Casandra? Sheriff Joe’s boys? And girls? Dream on!:)

  20 hours ago · Like · 2
• 

  Natalee Lee That’s just awful! Those people are just plain ignorant (last known of knowledge) trying to use the word properly most people just misuse the word We all Stand + Support you always Jodi Arias!

  20 hours ago · Like
• 

  Becky Atkinson It sure didn’ take long to get out.. WHY does everthing happen when i’m sleeping..

  9 hrs · Like
• 

  George Barwood Sandra Webber I sent it by PM to two supporters. I don’t know how it leaked, possibly someone’s FB account was hacked.

  9 hrs · Edited · Like
• 

  George Barwood I just noticed the “State” page don’t believe I went to Cambridge[ Draw-dropping emoticon here ] (He meant “Jaw dropping”.  He must have had an absentminded moment)

  9 hrs · Like
• 

  George Barwood They can have a look at this album:
  https://www.facebook.com/george.barwood/media_set…

  

  School reports and Cambridge certs etc

  Degree certificate, other certs and some funny school reports

  By: George Barwood

  Photos: 8

  9 hrs · Edited · Like
• 

  Becky Atkinson I don’t think it was hacked at that moment George. I believe folks misses hearing from/about Jodi and they was jealous..

  9 hrs · Like
• 

  Becky Atkinson I guess you call it lesson learned George Barwood. 

  9 hrs · Like · 1
• 

  Sandra Webber Which “supporters”? Because I can promise you, at least one of them was not….care to share?

  8 hrs · Like · 1
• 

  Casandra Picanco Sandra Webber I really thought hate mail was eliminated. Wishful thinking I guess.

  8 hrs · Like
• 

  George Barwood Sandra I don’t want to say in public who I sent it to, as that could cast undeserved suspicion on them.

  8 hrs · Like
• 

  Sandra Webber Bullshit, George! “Undeserved”? You have no idea the damage your “trust” in someone who you have NO IDEA about may end up causing! PM me if you care to.

  7 hrs · Like
• Boastful Barwood – and we WILL go over this, lmao:

  George Barwood shared a post to the group Free Jodi.

  40 mins · Edited · 

  A letter from Jodi I (stupidly) shared by PM with another supporter has leaked (I believe due to a short password being hacked).

  What’s funny though is that when I looked at the comments where it was posted on the “State” page, I read this:

  “The State vs Jodi Arias ~ Travis Alexander murder trial Michelle Moran – I don’t, for a minute, believe he went to Cambridge.”

  That’s really stupid! If they cannot understand such a simple, basic fact broadcast on HLN and easily verifiable by looking at my facebook account, it’s not surprising they cannot comprehend that Jodi is innocent!

  Just to make it easy, here are various certificates showing I really did go to Cambridge, and also indulged in other activities, such as music and Go.

  

  

  

  

  

  Degree certificate, other certs and some funny school reports

  Like ·  · Share

  • 

    George Barwood Apologies for this somewhat self-indulgent digression, I just thought it illustrates rather well the lack of integrity and sheer nuttiness of the infamous “State” page!Which in turn is a reflection of Juan Martinez.I also wondered whether this admin is related to Joe Arpaio

    27 mins · Edited · Like
  • 

    Coco Elcie George Barwood why do you care if they think you went to school or not? You are doing exactly what they want by defending it, plus Jodi’s life is on the line, not your education.

    22 mins · Like · 1
  • 

    George Barwood Coco Elcie I don’t care a jot, the point is the people on the State page have no credibility, it just goes to show that. And the devotees of the State page likewise.

    7 mins · Edited · Like

     

  • 

    George Barwood I’m also not so sure about the ethics of publishing private correspondence apparently obtained by illegal means…. worth a mention as well.

    5 mins · Like
  • 

    Coco Elcie Also, you weren’t hacked! As you say… “that’s pure rubbish”

    5 mins · Like
  • 

    George Barwood Coco Elcie It seems the person I sent it to was hacked. They were using too short a password. That doesn’t excuse the hacking, which is illegal.

    4 mins · Like
  • 

    Coco Elcie Your education in the 70’s seem to be more what you care to set straight, not that you shared her letter. The hackers are as likely as the Ninja’sGeorge.

    4 mins · Like
  • 

    Coco Elcie You admitted sharing with two people, all it takes is those two people to share with two more people each… no one was hacked. You can’t claim hacked after admitting to sharing it.

    2 mins · Like

  • No intention of offending:

    Coco Elcie

    12 hrs

    Can someone tell me who this Jodi profile belongs to?

    Like ·

    • Seen by 47

      Natalee Lee likes this.
    • 

      Grieta Hoga It’s a fake. Ignore.

      · Like · 1
    • 

      Natalee Lee Were all trying to figure this out apparently this person knows all of us I defined her last night cause I know this is not legit did you get one too

      · Like
    • 

      Coco Elcie Yep, deleting them now.

      · Like · 3
    • 

      Grieta Hoga It’s someone pretending to be Jodi. There is another one. It’s not uncommon in cases like these for people to pretend to be a defendant.

      · Like · 3
    • 

      Casandra Picanco I’d love to know how people find the time in their days to make fake accounts. I mean I can say if I found some spare time in my days, the LAST thing I’d do is make a fake account of someone else. Give me a damn break people. People need to get a life.

      · Like · 6
    • 

      Nina Kearney Bizarre!

      · Like · 1
    • 

      Natalee Lee Agreed cassandra!!

      · Like · 1
    • 

      Billy Hagstrom Personally I’m waiting for someone to create a fake Travis Alexander profile/page. This case has certainly brought out all the real life freaks of nature.

      · Like · 3
    • 

      Nene Peacock Don’t know, someone old time though as I removed myself from Ja discussions months ago and I still got a request. SMH

      11 hrs · Edited · Like · 1
    • 

      Yelaina Joy I just got one too…these people are humorous :X

      9 hrs · Like · 2
    • 

      Brooke Huston Perez Idk how they keep track.

      9 hrs · Like · 2
    • 

      Grieta Hoga It’s probably someone who is a member here and went off the members list.

      9 hrs · Like · 2
    • 

      Sherry Standard i never got one

      9 hrs · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy Sherry Standard I didn’t either.

      2 hrs · Like · 1
    • 

      Joe-Francisco Marin We should hope this person is no-longer in our group circle,otherwise a mole can do sufficent detremental damage to the credibilitys of this group or anyother loyal Jodi group 4 that matter. I suggest we do profile backround √s . Who’s 4 It???

      1 hr · Like · 1
    • 

      Madeline Mindy Joe I say , look for fake accounts.

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Joe-Francisco Marin Found some promising! Yet have to research a little more , thank you . This is going to detract from Jodi ,should we start ,’Witch-Hunting’, we just have to be careful what we say or suggest!

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy I say PM with people who you know if it is important.

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy ((TEAM JODI ))

      

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy

      

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy UNITY
      Bc a house divided, will fall.-

      

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Pamela Smith Profile backgrounds? *flicks tail* How can you tell a profile is fake? Hmmm…Hey! I know! You can google their name, see if they really exist. Well, almost. I usually go by “Pesky Vrmt”. Lets just try that and see …google “Pesky Vrmt”…then google…..Oh… Madeline Mindy.  LOVE the name Madeline!

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy Night everyone !

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Joe-Francisco Marin Nite..Nite..!

      1 hr · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy Thank you ,it’s my nana’s.

      33 mins · Like
    • 

      Pamela Smith Nana Biamonte?

      32 mins · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy Yes ma’am and proud of it. YOUR point?

      30 mins · Like
    • 

      Pamela Smith My Mothers Mother was Nana…paternal was Meme…

      30 mins · Like
    • 

      Pamela Smith You said nana.

      29 mins · Like
    • 

      Madeline Mindy Fredalia Biamonte, from Italy. Google that. NYC –

      29 mins · Like

    • Last but not least…

      George, you, Sir, are an idiot.

      George says:

      “The FACT is that Jodi has been WRONGLY CONVICTED, on total BULLSHIT EVIDENCE, and needs to APPEAL against the nonsense that was used to convict her in the media.

      Now many people too STUPID to recognize this, which is why they get removed from this group. Are you going to be one of them, or are you going to wake up and ADMIT that Jodi is one of the 1 in 25 ( probably much higher in Female Arizona DP cases, judging by history ) that was convicted on a wave of MEDIA HYPE and not on EVIDENCE.

      And the US “SYSTEM” is not a system at all, it is TOTALLY FUCKING BROKEN with IDIOT JURIES who have NO REAL CAPACITY TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES, they just BELIEVE WHAT SOME JERK OF A RANTING PROSECUTOR TELLS THEM.”

      Nice George.  You kiss your Grandkids with that mouth?

      How about you do the United States a favor and worry with your OWN Country’s problems.  You do not live here, and none of what goes on here is ANY of your business.

Alyce LaViolette – IDIOT Extraordinaire

Thank you Alyce LaViolette for those moments that you so blatantly LIED

that the Judge had to stop the trial so

Jodi’s Attorneys could instruct you to ANSWER THE FOGGIN QUESTION truthfully!

 

EVERYTHING you have done for DV victims in your entire career flew out the window,

all for your FIVE MINUTES OF FAME.

You had to be admonished, and at that moment, you completed

the utmost FAIL

where domestic violence victims are concerned.

YOU DID MORE HARM

to DV victims than you could EVER make up for.

 

Here’s your FIVE MINUTES OF FAME:

http://youtu.be/asj-6JTsVes

(and here is where you were handed your ass)

http://youtu.be/RT30c4H_OHM

 

Please do Domestic Violence Victims a favor and disappear.

Your VNN “Valemont” Comedy Break!

Without further ado, lmao:

http://youtu.be/43dkjB3Wdow

Since her singing career didn’t take off, she’s soliciting funds from the general public to publish her books:

http://www.gofundme.com/3n8zwc

Recent Donations (0)

$0 raised by 0 people in 9 months.

*

Not to worry!  She’s making (barely selling) ebooks about the tragedy of others, claiming there is some kind of biblical code in the shower stall where Travis Alexander was found!

http://www.amazon.ca/product-reviews/0062303996

She claims to be the WORLD’S FIRST “forensic numerological criminal profiler”.

*

Here she is in all her Glory:

It was Valemont that tagged George Barwood as a CLOWN:

Touchy aren’t ya?

They say the guilty protest the loudest.

I’m wondering if your mention of how broke you are is a ploy

to try to get people to donate to your  “Cause I’m Broke” Fund?